Category Archives: Society

Asian gangs sexually abusing young white girls… is unsurprising.

It’s not exactly a surprise. I lived in East London in a Pakistani heavy area for several years (now in a semi-rural suburb, thank god), and was treated on several occasions to young Pakistani men in the 17  to 25 year category having blazing arguments with their very young (mid teens normally) white girlfriends.

What did anyone expect? They can’t pursue girls from their own community for sex, if they tried the consequences for the girl could easily be fatal and the girl’s family might well see their way to giving the young man the beating of a lifetime. Add to this the unfortunately common belief that non-Muslim girls are moral trash… you don’t need to be Einstein to see there’s going to be a problem. Mainly, it’s just young Asian men with a white girlfriend. The only real issue is the level of organisation involved;  group offences speak to a common cultural attitude that something is ‘okay’. That’s the worrying part. European sex offenders tend to be solo, as they grasp how out of line from the social norm they are, and find it hard to find friend of a similar mindset. The prevalence of multiple offenders really speaks masses as to the Pakistani/UK Muslim underlying attitudes to women and sex; 53 out of the 56 offenders in the last 13 years were Asian; 50 were Pakistani. (Northern and Midlands police grooming convictions).

What did surprise me was the screeches of outrage from assorted politicians and community leaders.  The Muslim communities of Europe have a well documented history of sex offences, not just against the indigenous population but against females from their own groups who are westernising, or who don’t have male relatives to protect them (the tournade rapes in France are a prime example). Such is the effect of a backwards culture. Anyone wanting to understand this in-depth should study the Hudood ordnance, and the treatment of rape victims in Pakistan, which is where the young men involved in this trace their cultural roots to. It’s a backward traditionalist culture that treats their own women as little more than property. Why expect them to treat our daughters any better?


Leave a comment

Filed under race, Society, Uncategorized

Violent Crime ‘Race Gap’ Narrows, but Persists in US

The U.S. ‘race gap’ in the commission of violent crime has narrowed substantially, yet persists — with murder arrest rates for African Americans still out-distancing those for whites — concludes a new 80-city study by the University of Maryland, Florida State University and the University of Oregon…. LINK.

The most informative bit…

Based on FBI Uniform Crime Report arrest data from 1960 to 2000 in 80 of the largest U.S. cities (listed below), the researchers found:

  • 1960-1979: The gap between black and white homicide arrests dropped 55 percent, on average.
  • 1980-1999: The gap re-widened — on average more than 20 percent — with the explosive growth of the crack cocaine epidemic in major U.S. cities.
  • By the end of the century, nearly 30 percent of the largest U.S. cities had black homicide arrests rates that were more than 10 times higher than white rates.

Leave a comment

Filed under race, Society

The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America

The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America

Major Findings

  •  There is more black-on-white than black-on-black violent crime.
  •  Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence involving
    blacks and whites, 90 percent are committed by blacks against whites.
  • Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse.
  •  Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate.
  • Hispanics commit violent crimes at approximately three times the white rate,
    and Asians at one half to three quarters the white rate.
  • Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes.
    Hispanics are a hate crime victim category but not a perpetrator category.
  • Hispanic offenders are classified as whites, which inflates the white
    offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit no hate crimes.
  • Blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more
    dangerous than women.

A fairly old publication from 1999, which is based on the FBI crime statistics, and which is technically accurate. It was written in response to earlier use of the information that glossed over the black on white crime rate and focused almost exclusively on the black on black crime rate- amazing how the same set of information can be used to push different agendas. I’ve snipped out a few of the more memorable quotes- remember the numbers are completely correct and verifiable from the FBI crime stats.

Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial violent crimes involving blacks and whites reported every year, blacks commit 90 percent and whites commit only ten percent. Blacks are therefore more than 50 times more likely than whites to commit interracial crimes of violence. The differences are even greater for multiple-offender interracial crimes, with blacks 100 to 250 times more likely to be involved in gang attacks on whites than the reverse. Some people may argue that blacks attack whites because they expect them to be carrying cash or valuables. However, fewer than 20 percent of black attacks on whites are robberies; rape and assault do not usually have economic motives.

For virtually all crimes, there are consistent and pronounced differences in arrest rates for violent crime by race and ethnicity. Blacks are five to ten times more likely to be arrested than whites, Hispanics are approximately three times more likely, American Indians are about twice as likely, and Asians are only one half to two-thirds as likely to be arrested for violent crimes as whites. The very high rates for blacks means that the single best independent predictor of crime rates for an area is the percentage of the population that is black.

I’m not going to post the whole document, but it roughly matches the trends in the UK race crime stats that I posted earlier. It doesn’t really go into much detail about interracial sex crimes, which are almost entirely white on black, with some years the FBI having less than ten white on black rapes reported. But that’s for another post.

This is also very similar to the Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005 Statistical Tables (Page 30, chart 42), where the sex offence pattern is near identical but based on surveys rather than reported crimes. No longer available on-line, unfortunately.

Leave a comment

Filed under race, Society, Uncategorized

Atheists, the religious, and their behaviours compared.

I haunt the ‘religion and spirtuality’ section of yahoo answers. This has lead me to the observation that many Americans sincerely believe that all atheists are conscienceless materialists, willing to murder good Christian babies for a laugh, devoid of any kind of morality.

This is something of a strange viewpoint. Atheism is considered ‘pretty normal’ in Europe. In fact, there are a few countries now where atheists are the majority. Religion is much less of an issue here. Partly because we bundled all our religious fruitcakes onto ships and sent them to America, but mostly because we’ve seen enough religious conflict to last us to the next millennium. Admitting you are an atheist in the UK will be just a passing comment, and not some ‘coming out of the closet’ moment.

So, I thought I’d gather a few facts on the behaviour of atheists and religious people, for comparison.

Number of each group in prison in 1997

The Federal Bureau of Prisons statistics on religious affiliations of inmates.  The following are total number of inmates per religion category:

Response               Number        %
—————————-  ——–
Catholic                29267  39.164%
Protestant             26162  35.008%
Muslim                   5435     7.273%
American Indian       2408     3.222%
Nation                    1734     2.320%
Rasta                     1485     1.987%
Jewish                    1325     1.773%
Church of Christ       1303    1.744%
Pentecostal             1093    1.463%
Moorish                  1066    1.426%
Buddhist                  882     1.180%
Jehovah Witness      665     0.890%
Adventist                621      0.831%
Orthodox                375      0.502%
Mormon                  298      0.399%
Scientology            190       0.254%
Atheist                   156     0.209%
Hindu                     119       0.159%
Santeria                  117       0.157%
Sikh                        14        0.019%
Bahai                        9         0.012%
Krishna                    7         0.009%
—————————-  ——–
Total Known Responses  74731  100.001% (rounding to 3 digits does this)
Unknown/No Answer      18381
Total Convicted              93112   80.259% (74731) prisoners’ religion is known.
Held in Custody              3856     (not surveyed due to temporary custody)
Total In Prisons               96968

Compare this to the numbers of godless heathens in the population at large, about 10% in 1997…

Currently about 51% are Protestants, 24% Catholic,3.3% Christian ‘other’, 0.8% Muslim.

This works out as atheists being about 50 times less likely to commit an imprisonable offence.

Catholics are about 2/3 more likely than average to be criminals. Protestants are a less likely (about 2/3 as criminal as average).

Muslims are about nine times more likely to be in prison.

The high number of muslims is reputed to be because of the high conversion rate in black males in prison. However, the UK is over-represented by Muslims too, 12% of the prisoners, 3.1% of the population. This might be to a lot of them being poor immigrants, but a Dutch study showed that they commited more crime even weighting for socio-economic status.

So, do atheists condone the use of torture? Apparently not.

According to a survey posted on the National Catholic Reporter, here are the percentages of people who say that torture is never justified:

26% Catholics
31% White Protestant
31% White evangelical
41% Secular
32% Overall Population
Here are the numbers who think that torture is often justified:

21% Catholics
15% White Protestant
13% White evangelical
10% Secular
15% Overall Population

I have to say, Catholics aren’t coming across well here.

So, are religious morals more likely to help you to keep your marriage together?

Religion % have been divorced

Jews 30%
Born-again Christians 27%
Other Christians 24%
Atheists, Agnostics 21%

Or do religious ideals compel you to do more charitable work? Nope, atheist doctors do more charity work too. Possibly it’s because the Catholic doctors have bigger families to feed.

Researchers from the University of Chicago and Yale New Haven Hospital report that 31 percent of physicians who were more religious—as measured by “intrinsic religiosity” as well as frequency of attendance at religious services—practiced among the underserved, compared to 35 percent of physicians who described their religion as atheist, agnostic or none.

The news gets worse for the religious. It seems, the higher your IQ, the less likely you are to believe in God.

This isn’t exactly shocking news, it’s been pretty well hammered out in various psychology papers before. A decent quote for this article is that..

A survey of Royal Society fellows found that only 3.3 per cent believed in God – at a time when 68.5 per cent of the general UK population described themselves as believers.

A separate poll in the 90s found only seven per cent of members of the American National Academy of Sciences believed in God.

When the British say ‘believers’, it usually means ‘the kids are christened and we go to the midnight mass at Christmas’. The actual number of churchgoing Brits is… well, I don’t personally know any. About 3%, so I’m told.

So how religious are Europeans? Lets look at the religiosity of Europe… the darker the purple, the more they pray.

You have to remember that ‘being religious’ in Europe is generally a less ‘go to church/smite the heathens’ and more ‘get the kids into that nice church school’. One of the more amusing factoids I came across was that Catholic Italy has the lowest birthrate in Europe, 1.1 child per woman. So I take their protestations of good Catholicism with a grain of salt. You could hardly say the ungodliness and anarchy go hand in hand from comparing the least religious states with the most. Norway, Sweden and Holland are renowned for their kindly social systems and law abiding citizens. Switzerland is one of the dullest-I mean, tidy and law abiding, places on the planet. But a belief in god seems pretty uncommon there. Another example of an atheist country renowned for its law abiding citizens is Japan.

So, does atheism lead to irresponsible sexual behaviour in children? Now, that is harder to examine. Lets look at the teenage pregnancy rates of these countries compared to America (all developed countries with a high GDP).

From.. Differences in Teenage Pregnancy Rates Among Five Developed Countries: The Roles of Sexual Activity and Contraceptive Use

Adolescent childbearing is more common in the United States (22% of women reported having had a child before age 20) than in Great Britain (15%), Canada (11%), France (6%) and Sweden (4%); differences are even greater for births to younger teenagers. A lower proportion of teenage pregnancies are resolved through abortion in the United States than in the other countries; however, because of their high pregnancy rate, U.S. teenagers have the highest abortion rate. The age of sexual debut varies little across countries, yet American teenagers are the most likely to have multiple partners. A greater proportion of U.S. women reported no contraceptive use at either first or recent intercourse (25% and 20%, respectively) than reported nonuse in France (11% and 12%, respectively), Great Britain (21% and 4%, respectively) and Sweden (22% and 7%, respectively).

Since America is by far the most religious of these developed countries, it can’t be said religion is any kind of factor in stopping the children getting up to mischief. It actually seems that the less religious a country, the less irresponsible underage sex you get. Probably because of realistic contraceptive education programs.

Another common charge is that ‘all modern morality is derived from religion’, and that we are living by some ancient god’s moral code, even if we don’t accept it. Well, since I’ve seen altruistic behaviour in house-pets I’m fairly sure have never read the bible, I can declare that ridiculous. Religious morality is derived from humans own natural behaviour, not vice versa.

So, in summary, the less religious you are, the more… law abiding, intelligent, monogamous, charitable, moral and sexual responsible you are likely to be.

Obviously, a threat to civilisation as we know it.

1 Comment

Filed under Society

Immigration hate and the UK. Not about race, about culture and cash.

I was reading through some information on Britain’s recent immigration wave (more like a tsunami), and the official conclusion to it..

 ‘Record levels of immigration have had “little or no impact” on the economic well-being of Britons, an influential House of Lords committee has said.’

This item goes on to conclude that..

‘competition from immigrants has had a negative impact on the low paid and training for young UK workers, and has contributed to high house prices’.

Also, Migrationwatch worked out that the economic benefit from migration was..

‘The difference between these figures, it said, amounted to a 4p gain for each person in the UK per week – or about £2.10 a year’

Another conclusion from the Office for National Statistics was..

‘Mass immigration has been accompanied by a fall in the number of Britons with jobs, official figures show.

Since 2004, when citizens of eight central and eastern European countries were given the right to work in Britain, the number of UK-born people working here has fallen by 500,000, from 24.4 million to 23.9 million.

Over the period, the number of migrants in work, including people born abroad but now naturalised as British citizens, rose by 1.1 million – to 3.3 million. They now make up one in eight of the workforce.’

So, they pushed up the house prices, didn’t bring any extra money in, and caused unemployment and a reduction in training in the young and unskilled. It does seem to me that it was rather stupid letting so many in. The usual reason you see trotted out is that ‘if they don’t let them in, we’ll have to work an extra five years each to cover the pensions shortage’. And I am absolutely fine with doing just that. The pension was meant to see you through your final years where you were too infirm to support yourself, not to let you sit on your behind for twenty years (female retirement is sixty in the UK) twiddling your thumbs. I’d prefer to work, given the choice. The real answer would be to make part time employment for older people more viable, not boost the younger population with immigration.

The current UK population is now at over sixty million, and about 45% of the yearly increase in population is due to immigration. About 8% of the UK population was born overseas. At the moment about 240,000 immigrants arrive in our tiny little island every years. The population is set to hit 77 million by 2050. Call me gloomy, but where is all the extra housing coming from? It’s pretty crowded (and very expensive) in the UK already.

I have to say, when I was doing temporary work fruit packing in my twenties, the sudden influx of eastern European girls did have a negative affect on how much money I earned. There’d  be a set number of orders to clear in a day. Prior to their arrival, we’d work a full day. After their arrival, we’d always end up going home a couple of hours early, this really took it’s toll on my pay packet.

That’s not mentioning the Romanian crime wave in central London. My husband works at a major London tourist attraction, and there are gangs of Romanian kids (sent out by their parents) picking pockets and snatching bags. And we can’t deport them. I admire the stance the Japanese tour guides took though. They hired muscle to hang around a few metres behind the tours, and waited for the kids to make a run on the group. They then proceeded to give the little thieves a few good kicks, and after that the rate of pickpocketing on the Japanese tour groups in the museum went right down.

The population projections have worked out that the indigenous British will be a minority in London sometime in the next few decades. I have to say, my main objection to all this is the people who flatly refuse to integrate, and try to change the country they’ve moved to into a little piece of the one they left. That is not the point of moving to a new country. I mean, if you don’t like it, why go there? If the old country and culture was so great, why leave?

This isn’t ‘all about race’. There was a big backlash against the Poles, and they are blonder and bluer eyed than your average Stormfront member. it’s about overcrowding, money and clashing cultures.


Filed under Society